Trump Explains Ye-Fuentes-Milo Visit to Mar-a-Largo - Anybody Buying This?

The other day President Donald Trump went on his social media platform called TRUTH SOCIAL to explain why he met with Kanye West and his two companions; self-avowed white supremacist Nick Fuentes and one-time alt-right (whatever the hell that means) and the sometimes confused Milo Yiannopoiulos for dinner at the former president's home at Mar-a-Largo in Florida.

The president has received a ton of backlash from all sides for this meeting, especially after Kanye's, aka Ye, recent antisemitic diatribes in the press and on social media across the web.

Trump attempted to explain his meeting with Kanye reminding everyone that this meeting was set up long before Kanye's recent self-destructive foray, stating on Truth Social that he met with an old friend who is a

"seriously troubled man,"
in order to give him some much needed
"advice."
Trump also added:

"He shows up with three people, two of which I didn’t know, the other a political person who I haven’t seen in years. I told him don’t run for office, a total waste of time, can’t win. Fake News went CRAZY!"

I am not buying into President Trump's explanation about the dinner with Kanye, Fuentes and Milo. I get that Kanye may have been scheduled to meet with him alone well in advance but to just let two other people in who have not been pre-approved doesn't sound kosher at all. All President's and First Ladies have Secret Service protection for the rest of their lives and all persons coming and going into the president and first lady's presence are closing scrutinized . Is Trump expecting us to believe that these two (not on the guest-list) anarchists got by the Secret Service's checks without permission from The Donald? I don't think so.

I like Trump, voted for him twice, but he really needs to clean up his act or he will loose this one before the horse is even out of the gate. Very troubling!

Kudos to Tim Pool for standing his ground in his recent interview with Kanye, Fuentes and Yiannopoiulos for allowing these hateful people to expose their duplicity for all to see.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

After 2024 - Ballots or Bullets?

Image
Why 2024 Might be the LAST ELECTION Decided by BALLOTS by Gov. Mike Huckabee Do you know how political opponents to those in power are dealt with in 3 rd World dictatorships, banana republics, and communist regimes? Simple—the people in power use their police agencies to arrest their opponents for made up crimes in an attempt to discredit them, bankrupt them, imprison them or exile them, or all of the above. And if you are paying attention, you may not realize that Joe Biden is usually exactly those tactics to make sure Donald Trump is not his opponent in 2024. This kind of thuggery at taxpayer expense is not supposed to happen in the United States. We are supposed to be a nation of laws and not a nation of powerful people. But the Biden administration is in full melt-down mode to hide the money-laundering, influence peddling, and outright bribery that Joe, his son Hunter, and their associates have been conducting for well over a decade that has enriched them to the tune of
Read more

Intent Is At the Core

Having ascertained that the negative information is accurate, that the perpetrator was not justified, and that reproof has proven unsuccessful (thus making it clear that there is a legitimate need to relate the information), one final condition must be met before the information can be conveyed. The speaker must be certain that his sole intent is l’toeless (gain, advantage), for a constructive purpose. However, if he knows in his heart he is pleased to cast the perpetrator in a bad light, he is not permitted to speak — even though the purpose cannot be accomplished any other way. It is lowly to enjoy speaking negatively — even for constructive purpose. This is especially challenging when one is required to speak about a person with whom he does not get along. It is necessary to first eradicate any negative feelings toward that person, and only then can the negative information be spoken. “If a word is worth one coin, silence is worth two.” - R’ Yehoshua Sefer Chofetz Chaim
Read more