Can G-d’s existence be proven beyond reasonable doubt?

No. Not rationally, logically or with human reasoning.

Using the scientific method the existence of G-d cannot be proven. G-d can be experienced by the individual or a group, but can never be proven.

Any god whose existence can be proven using human logic and science will not be G-d. Why? Because G-d's thoughts are not our thoughts and G-d's ways are not our ways. It would be like an ant trying to prove or explain to his fellow ants what a human being is. An ant cannot prove our existence any more than we can prove G-d's. An ant can experience us but never fully understand, explain or know us. We live on two different planes of existence (different frequencies or vibrations) even though we may appear to be sharing the same space.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

After 2024 - Ballots or Bullets?

Image
Why 2024 Might be the LAST ELECTION Decided by BALLOTS by Gov. Mike Huckabee Do you know how political opponents to those in power are dealt with in 3 rd World dictatorships, banana republics, and communist regimes? Simple—the people in power use their police agencies to arrest their opponents for made up crimes in an attempt to discredit them, bankrupt them, imprison them or exile them, or all of the above. And if you are paying attention, you may not realize that Joe Biden is usually exactly those tactics to make sure Donald Trump is not his opponent in 2024. This kind of thuggery at taxpayer expense is not supposed to happen in the United States. We are supposed to be a nation of laws and not a nation of powerful people. But the Biden administration is in full melt-down mode to hide the money-laundering, influence peddling, and outright bribery that Joe, his son Hunter, and their associates have been conducting for well over a decade that has enriched them to the tune of
Read more

Intent Is At the Core

Having ascertained that the negative information is accurate, that the perpetrator was not justified, and that reproof has proven unsuccessful (thus making it clear that there is a legitimate need to relate the information), one final condition must be met before the information can be conveyed. The speaker must be certain that his sole intent is l’toeless (gain, advantage), for a constructive purpose. However, if he knows in his heart he is pleased to cast the perpetrator in a bad light, he is not permitted to speak — even though the purpose cannot be accomplished any other way. It is lowly to enjoy speaking negatively — even for constructive purpose. This is especially challenging when one is required to speak about a person with whom he does not get along. It is necessary to first eradicate any negative feelings toward that person, and only then can the negative information be spoken. “If a word is worth one coin, silence is worth two.” - R’ Yehoshua Sefer Chofetz Chaim
Read more